X-Git-Url: http://christophe.rhodes.io/gitweb/?p=specializable.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=prototype-specializer.lisp;fp=prototype-specializer.lisp;h=4a2c841f9b08c3598d469da611939cd63c1f689c;hp=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000;hb=1ee54cd06b82b30021b63046cb12f953402599cc;hpb=8825f12a566f7b3367d9cb9d77743ae2fdf0aa6c diff --git a/prototype-specializer.lisp b/prototype-specializer.lisp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4a2c841 --- /dev/null +++ b/prototype-specializer.lisp @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@ +(in-package "SPECIALIZABLE") + +(defclass prototype-object () + (;; FIXME: we should add slots at some point + (delegations :initarg :delegations :accessor delegations) + (roles :initform (make-array 0 :adjustable t :fill-pointer t) + :accessor roles) + ;; debugging aid + (name))) +(defmethod print-object ((o prototype-object) s) + (if (slot-boundp o 'name) + (format s "~S" (slot-value o 'name)) + (print-unreadable-object (o s :type t :identity t) + (format s "[~{~S~^, ~}]" (delegations o))))) +(defun add-delegation (obj del) + (push del (delegations obj))) +(defun remove-delegation (obj) + (pop (delegations obj))) +(defun map-delegations (fun obj) + (funcall fun obj) + ;; FIXME: should we maintain a table of visited nodes? Should it be + ;; topologically sorted? Section 5.3 in PwMD [Salzman & Aldrich] + ;; suggests not, at least for now + (mapc (lambda (o) (map-delegations fun o)) (delegations obj)) + nil) +(defstruct (role (:type list) (:constructor make-role (method argpos))) + method argpos) +(defun add-role (obj role) + (let ((pos (role-argpos role)) + (roles (roles obj))) + (unless (< pos (length roles)) + (dotimes (i (- (1+ pos) (length roles))) + (vector-push-extend nil roles))) + (pushnew (role-method role) (aref roles pos)))) +(defun remove-role (obj role) + (let ((pos (role-argpos role))) + (setf (aref (roles obj) pos) + (remove (role-method role) (aref (roles obj) pos))) + (tagbody + start + (when (or (= (length (roles obj)) 0) + (aref (roles obj) (1- (length (roles obj))))) + (go done)) + (vector-pop (roles obj)) + (go start) + done))) +(defun map-roles (fun obj) + (dotimes (i (length (roles obj))) + (dolist (m (aref (roles obj) i)) + (funcall fun (make-role m i))))) +(defun find-role (role obj) + (when (< (role-argpos role) (length (roles obj))) + (find (role-method role) (aref (roles obj) (role-argpos role))))) +(defmacro do-roles ((rvar form &optional result) &body body) + `(progn (map-roles (lambda (,rvar) ,@body) ,form) ,result)) +(defun clone (p) + (let ((result (make-instance 'prototype-object + :delegations (copy-list (delegations p))))) + (do-roles (r p result) + (add-role result r)))) + +;;; redefinition semantics are interesting. We need the INFO here so +;;; that we can implement specializer-accepts-p, which must be able to +;;; lookup the particular method/argpos that the specializer +;;; represents. But we must also be able to redefine methods in a way +;;; that isn't insane, which I think implies that same-specializer-p +;;; should ignore the INFO and just use the OBJECT. +(defclass prototype-specializer (extended-specializer) + ((role :accessor prototype-specializer-role) + (object :initarg :object :accessor prototype-specializer-object))) +(defmethod print-object ((o prototype-specializer) s) + (print-unreadable-object (o s :type t :identity t) + (format s "~S" (prototype-specializer-object o)))) +(defmethod sb-pcl::same-specializer-p + ((s1 prototype-specializer) (s2 prototype-specializer)) + (eql (prototype-specializer-object s1) + (prototype-specializer-object s2))) +(defclass prototype-generic-function (specializable-generic-function) + () + (:metaclass sb-mop:funcallable-standard-class)) +(defmethod sb-pcl:make-method-specializers-form + ((gf prototype-generic-function) method snames env) + (flet ((frob (x) + (typecase x + (sb-mop:specializer x) + (symbol `(make-instance 'prototype-specializer :object ,x)) + ((cons (eql 'class)) `(find-class ',(cadr x))) + ((cons (eql 'eql)) `(sb-mop:intern-eql-specializer ,(cadr x))) + (t (error "unexpected specializer name: ~S" x))))) + `(list ,@(mapcar #'frob snames)))) +(defmethod sb-pcl:parse-specializer-using-class + ((gf prototype-generic-function) name) + (make-instance 'prototype-specializer :object name)) +(defmethod sb-pcl:unparse-specializer-using-class + ((gf prototype-generic-function) (s prototype-specializer)) + (let ((object (prototype-specializer-object s))) + (if (slot-boundp object 'name) + (slot-value object 'name) + s))) + +(defmethod add-method :after ((gf prototype-generic-function) m) + (let ((ss (sb-mop:method-specializers m))) + (do* ((i 0 (1+ i)) + (ss ss (cdr ss)) + (s (car ss) (car ss))) + ((null ss)) + (when (typep s 'prototype-specializer) + (let ((object (prototype-specializer-object s)) + (role (make-role m i))) + (setf (prototype-specializer-role s) role) + (add-role object role)))))) +(defmethod remove-method :after ((gf prototype-generic-function) m) + (let ((ss (sb-mop:method-specializers m))) + (do* ((i 0 (1+ i)) + (ss ss (cdr ss)) + (s (car ss) (car ss))) + ((null ss)) + (when (typep s 'prototype-specializer) + (let ((object (prototype-specializer-object s)) + (role (make-role m i))) + (setf (prototype-specializer-role s) nil) + ;; this is one of the places where the semantics + ;; are... dodgy. Removing the method from the generic + ;; function, and the role from the object, doesn't affect + ;; the roles in any clones. We could potentially use the + ;; fact that once removed the method is no longer associated + ;; with a generic function? Hm, C-A-M will not consider the + ;; removed method for applicability... + (remove-role object role)))))) + +(defmethod generalizer-of-using-class + ((gf prototype-generic-function) (object prototype-object)) + object) + +(defmethod specializer-accepts-generalizer-p + ((gf prototype-generic-function) (s prototype-specializer) object) + (values (specializer-accepts-p s object) t)) + +(defmethod specializer-accepts-p ((specializer prototype-specializer) object) + (cond + ((not (typep object 'prototype-object)) nil) + ((eql (prototype-specializer-object specializer) /root/) t) + (t + (let ((role (prototype-specializer-role specializer))) + (map-delegations + (lambda (o) + (when (find-role role o) + (return-from specializer-accepts-p t))) + object))))) + +(defmethod specializer< ((gf prototype-generic-function) (s1 prototype-specializer) (s2 prototype-specializer) g) + (let ((o1 (prototype-specializer-object s1)) + (o2 (prototype-specializer-object s2))) + (map-delegations + (lambda (o) + (cond + ((eql o o1) (return-from specializer< '<)) + ((eql o o2) (return-from specializer< '>)))) + g) + '=)) + +(defmethod compute-applicable-methods-using-generalizers ((gf prototype-generic-function) generalizers) + (values nil nil)) +(defmethod generalizer-equal-hash-key ((gf prototype-generic-function) (g prototype-object)) + g) + +(defmacro defpvar (name value) + `(let ((val ,value)) + (setf (slot-value val 'name) ',name) + (defparameter ,name val))) + +(defpvar /root/ (make-instance 'prototype-object :delegations nil)) +(defpvar /animal/ (clone /root/)) +(defpvar /fish/ (clone /root/)) +(defpvar /shark/ (clone /root/)) +(defpvar /healthy-shark/ (clone /root/)) +(defpvar /dying-shark/ (clone /root/)) +(add-delegation /fish/ /animal/) +(add-delegation /shark/ /animal/) +(add-delegation /shark/ /healthy-shark/) +(defgeneric encounter (x y) + (:generic-function-class prototype-generic-function)) +(defmethod encounter ((x /fish/) (y /healthy-shark/)) + (format t "~&~A swims away~%" x)) +(defmethod encounter ((x /fish/) (y /animal/)) + x) +(defgeneric fight (x y) + (:generic-function-class prototype-generic-function)) +(defmethod fight ((x /healthy-shark/) (y /shark/)) + (remove-delegation x) + (add-delegation x /dying-shark/) + x) +(defmethod encounter ((x /healthy-shark/) (y /fish/)) + (format t "~&~A swallows ~A~%" x y)) +(defmethod encounter ((x /healthy-shark/) (y /shark/)) + (format t "~&~A fights ~A~%" x y) + (fight x y))